A light has come 

Friday Link List | 18th December 2015

Every Friday I’m posting links to things I’ve read this week that I think you might find interesting too, next week I want to start sharing some links readers of the site are finding interesting…If you read something you think should be featured here submit it here, starting your message LINK LIST SUGGESTION.


What I posted recently


  • We enjoyed our yearly christmas tradition (apart from when we are away from Cape Town), of singing Carol’s at kirstenbosch botanical gardens last night, amazing how carols singing remains one of the most culturally celebrated forms of publicly proclaiming the Gospel.

Theology

  • Well this year we have engaged the rhythms of expectation that advent invite more than ever before. Mostly due to facilitating some gatherings in our church community around this season of the church calendar. In putting it together I came across lots of useful resources that I found (although too late for you this year). One of the finds of my research into advent was this song, written by Dustin Kensrue and sung to the tune of auld lang syne. It was the perfect combination of a tune everyone could sing to and new words which captured the season, we sung it to end each of the three 1 advent services we gathered for.



Drawing insights from psychology, sociology, biology, and (mainly Jewish) theology, Sacks– himself a deeply religious man–understands well the maxim made famous by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn that the line dividing good and evil does not run between groups but through every human heart. Still, the tendency to hive off into groups and define one’s group against others constitutes the heart of the matter and disposes us not only to great evil but to great good. And this is the rub. Or, as Sacks puts it: “what is best in us and what is worst both come from the same source: our tendency to form ourselves into groups [and] to think highly of our own and negatively of others.”
Most would recognize this as all-too-human tendency but know, too, that groups can inspire and enable our better angels. The path to violence takes shape when three additional items are added. First, group formation must occur around our deepest convictions, which are often religious or metaphysical in nature; Sacks employs a line from Pascal to underscore this point: “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do so from religious conviction.” Second, one has to experience or at least be persuaded that the “other group” has committed grave wrongdoing against your group—your family, your clan, your religion. Finally, you need unscrupulous leaders to enflame a pervasive, righteous feeling of victimhood, enabling one to see the “other group” as utterly despicable, subhuman, malevolent.


Lasting glory cannot be gotten, but it can be gazed upon in God’s Story. The Story of the Tree, which began as a Twig, and became a Roman Cross, to save us from ourselves. This Story is invisible to the proud, to the faithless, Who this small Bethlehem Babe really is; God in the flesh, Immanuel, God with us.


A recently made friend Steve Cochrane, both a pioneer missionary to india and a early church of the east scholar has been writing excellent things recently, none more than this post on meeting Mother Teresa here

“In these times when so many seek attention and promote themselves or their own agendas , Mother Teresa’s desire to be a “pencil in God’s hands” rings out so powerfully.”


I read a listened to a couple of things about racial diversity in the church this week which are worth your time;

and


Geo-centrisim upside down from Think Theology

The personal and political shenanigans behind the Galileo affair are far more interesting, and indeed amusing, than the traditional Science vs Religion narrative would have us believe. It certainly was not a matter of “ecclesiastical cover-up” against “intellectual freedom” (as fancifully narrated in one of the most garish abuses of history ever seen in The West Wing); it was actually Pope Urban who had asked for openness to the evidence, and Galileo who had refused to provide it.


Imagery

Flickr Blog posted the top photos by country in 2015, fascinating to see which photos are liked across cultures and nations like this.

Big Picture on shadows and silhouettes.


If you want to receive articles like this once a week to your email sign up here



  1. I do realise there are meant to be four. 

Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, Set up your kingdom in our midst. Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Living God, Have mercy on me, a sinner. Holy Spirit, breath of the Living God, Renew me and… Read More

NT Wright

What’s your inheritance? Prodigals and Inheritance

A short thought on prodigals, inheritance and salvation

I’ve been thinking about the impact the words we use in bible translations might have. How they have the potential to mislead us because of our experience of their modern usage.

As a case study I began thinking about the idea of inheritance; a legal and cultural phenomena practised in different ways across cultures and times yet it is used as an important metaphor for what we receive in Christ through our salvation.

Often we find ourselves reading these words without critically reflecting on whether we are reading the same meaning the writers intended.

Modern western inheritance looks mostly like a change in the amount of digits in someone’s online banking profile. If there is property involved, or anything of monetary rather than sentimental value it gets sold to pay taxes, to split the worth amongst siblings or to free the receiver from existing debt.

I’ve made no secret about my favourite (if that is in anyway an appropriate way to relate to bible stories) parable being the story of the Prodigal son. It might be the best way for us to get a glance into the way inheritance was viewed in 1st century Palestine.

Parables in my understanding are stories which depict familiar scenarios with an unexpected twist or hook which makes a point to describe hard to grasp realities of the kingdom of God.

So, lets consider this story and I’ll confess this is guess work here; It was unusual for sons to sell off their inheritance, and the average inheritance was not primarily money but property and animals. Owning and running the family farm.

This already has signifcant implcaitions for our understanding of the concept. In the modern western idea of inheritance we receive a non-physical bump in our net worth. It makes us rich (if the inheritance is significant), it’s free us from responsibility (maybe pays off a mortgage / loans) gives us freedom for new choices. Moving to bigger house, a new car, maybe even give up the second job you’ve been working to makes end meet.

In contrast the ancient world inheritance does almost the opposite. Inheriting a farm gives you increased riches in asset rather than net worth. And it comes with both a new job and new responsibility.

I speak to alot of people who are saved but struggle endlessly with a sense of purpose or vocation. Secondly they struggle with connecting their work-life with their salvation. What are the implications if we think salvation is a one time deposit of so-called freedom but doesn’t contain the resources to live out our lives in God? What if we understood our inheritance as a vocation, a responsibility and great riches in the same soil that our family has been labouring in for generations.

Sometimes our theology has been so guarded against “works based salvation” we have become confused about how work and activity can contribute to the life God intended us to live with Him all along.

As Dallas Willard says;

In most churches we’re not only saved by grace, we’re paralyzed by it.

Rather than view our salvation as a one-time clearing of a negative bank balance, what if we entered into the life of salvation by joining in with the family business. There is something winsome about someone who is engaged in work that gives them purpose greater than themselves. I think a farm is a good metaphor for this kingdom-business Jesus has b(r)ought us into.

  • Farms need collaboration,
  • they need many things to happen to contribute to one main goal,
  • they require care for whats gone before and what will come,
  • they create more than they take and become generous past their borders,
  • they rely on provision from uncontrollable elements (and ultimately God Himself).

Maybe if we returned to this 1st century understanding of inheritance 1 maybe we could be excited both about the embrace the Father gives his prodigal son, but also the gift of vocation and responsibility that comes with returning to the farm and being part of the family again.


  1. at least the one I’m imaginatively proposing here. 

Friday Link List | 11th December 2015

Here’s this Friday’s link list, enjoy some reading this weekend;

…If you read something you think should be featured submit it here, starting your message LINK LIST SUGGESTION.


  • I spent a crazed evening last Sunday live streaming the first every WSL big wave event held at Pe’ahi or Jaws as it is more widely known. Check out mind-blowing images here

“How Lewis came to be recruited and by whom remains a secret. The records of the Secret Intelligence Service, known popularly as MI6, remain closed. Perhaps one of his former pupils at Oxford recommended him for his mission. It was an unusual mission for which few people were suited. J. R. R. Tolkien had the knowledge base for the job, even beyond that of Lewis, but Tolkien lacked other skills that Lewis possessed.”



“Unlike premodern Christians, modern Christians are often functional empiricists, who instinctively believe that only visible things are real. At best, we are deists: of course, there is God up there somewhere, but he is a long way off. We do not think that we have to press through a crowd of angels every time we move; we do not think that a small angelic deployment runs ahead of us into danger; we do not think, as the poet Francis Thompson does, that we disturb an angel every time we turn a stone; we do not think, to quote Thompson again, that Jacob’s ladder is pitched between heaven and Charing Cross. ”


“My fear? That apocalyptic theology too much looks like a kind of gnosticism. That is, the only way to know God is by knowing what apocalyptic theologians know, and what this means is that one must be born again to know this kind of knowing. (This is the second section’s emphasis of this chp.) That is, soteriology and reconciliation are pre-conditions for knowing. Perhaps I overstate, but I must register this fear of the approach. There is then an emphasis on God’s revelation in Christ and less emphasis on the incarnation as a reality in history — and God trusting us to make sense of that incarnated reality.”

“The principle of the relaxed grasp is about releasing people into God’s hands so He can put them into yours. We don’t serve in order to be good leaders, but we’re more likely to be good leaders if we serve people rather than grasping them as ours. If we serve people well, we influence them, and if we influence them, then we have spiritual authority in their lives. Serving equals influence equals authority. Those who do not take hold of this Jesus-approach to leadership assume they have the right to insist on people submitting to them and respecting them.”

“With as few women as enter the world of Christian academia, you typically start with a small pool to begin with, and once you layer on limitations of discipline, expertise/specialization, approach, the book idea itself, or any theological parameters, you are left with a handful—at best. And the few (any?) women you are left with are already booked up years out or have other priorities, commitments, or preferences. Many simply say no. I am not making excuses, but, strategy or not, publishers are constrained by the shape of the academy. The representation of women in our academy—or lack thereof—is alarming.”



“Among the inconvenient truths about terrorism that European and American publics avoid facing up to is this: aerial bombardments with drones, cruise missiles and fighter jets are merely expensive, knee-jerk reactions by governments designed to give the semblance of “doing something” to their electorates. They have no clearly defined military or political end in view. If no conventional war has ever been won by air campaigns, how much less likely the unconventional war against ISIL (or al-Qa’ida).
The UK and US governments have clearly not learned from the fiascos in Iraq and Libya. These military adventures left over a million Iraqis killed and the region awash in advanced weapons that have fallen into the hands of new militias of which ISIL is the most dangerous.”


“Do you see what happened there? Our over familiarity with the story can cause us miss it, but Mary did something astonishing. She chose to accept God’s plan for. This might not sound like much of a new insight until we consider that, by indicating that she freely accepted this great responsibility, we realize that she was free to refuse. Mary could have declined being the mother of Jesus, the vessel through which the incarnation entered the world. Some will argue that God’s will is absolute, that Mary did not truly have the choice, but her agency in this moment is critical. In that moment after the angel informed her what would happen- in that momentary pause before she answered- she was free to choose.”



  • Part 1 and 2 of an interesting 3 part series on Baptism by Alistair Roberts

“Christians, even those who say much about ‘incarnational’ faith, can say surprisingly little about the way that God claims our bodies.”

and;

“My body defies the distinction between subject and object: it is both the site of my interiority and subjectivity, yet also an object that exists in continuity with the world and as a part of nature that others can act upon. My body is the site of my consciousness, my sense of self, and my action, but before these come into being, my body receives meaning and identity from other sources. My ‘self’ is never simply my subjectivity: it is also my bodily objectivity and in this objectivity my body is the bearer of ‘given’ meanings that precede me, my subjectivity, my choices, and my actions.”

finally;

“Once again, this reveals problems with some popular language about baptism. When we speak of baptism as expressive of the candidate’s ‘decision,’ we either implicitly resist the givenness of our selves, or we fail to address God’s salvation to the most basic dimension of our humanity.[1] Insistence upon the reality of original sin is, in part, insistence that alienation from God is an aspect of our givenness in a fallen world, not merely a result of our subjectively chosen action. The waters of baptism run deeper than action, deeper than choice, and even deeper than consciousness and subjectivity. They declare a new givenness, that my body is now defined by its relation to Jesus Christ and his body.”

“I remember the weeks leading up to that day when the numbers in my checking account suddenly swelled dramatically. They were anxious. I stood at the doorsteps of The Dream. A lifetime of expectations about how totally, utterly awesome it would be to be a millionaire. I’d be able to buy all the computers and cameras I ever wanted and any car I desired!”
I can only speak to the experience I did have. The one I do share with millions of people who have the basics taken care of, but who still yearn for the treasure perceived to be behind the curtain. For those who might contemplate giving up all manners of integrity, dignity, or even humanity to pull it back.
We humans acclimate to our surroundings incredibly quickly. The buzz is not going to last. Until you realize the next rung of the ladder isn’t where salvation hides, the siren song will keep playing.

“You have to pray. You have to listen to the voice who calls you the beloved, because otherwise you will run around begging for affirmation, for praise, for success. And then you are not free.”

Henri Nouwen

Why I side-stepped the Book of Revelation and 5 Things to know about it

Side-stepping revelation

Revelation is an intimidating book of the bible. Growing up in the faith I was taught (either explicitly or implicitly), that “revelation is hard to understand, brings division” and “not to worry about it, God will figure out and we don’t have to understand.”

More at stake than I thought

The longer I have spent participating and observing disciple-making contexts, the more I have realised there is actually a lot at stake in whether or not we read revelation and exactly how we understand what is written in it. One of my goals this year was to understand the book a little better and figure out what might be a reasonable take on how to read it. To that end, I bought Revelation – A shorter commentary by G.K. Beale and David H. Campbell.1

Secondly, I dug out the mini-popular-level commentary by Tom Wright, Revelation for Everyone, I’ve really enjoyed the overview commentary style of the ..for everyone, it certainly isn’t scholarly in the traditional sense but gives enough backing to not miss the point of the verse and drench it in a modern reading that misses the original context.
So, maybe this is the beginning of short series (depending on how successfully I can find time to read these books (and the book of revelation itself) amidst our work and thesis writing!

Eschatology or ESCAPEology

Most people agree (though not all with the second point) that revelation has something to say about both life in Christ now, namely discipleship, and something about a reality to come in the future. The second point, how we imagine God’s future plans, has struck me as an extremely significant aspect that affects our life lived now. For example, certain ‘last things’ theories portray a sense in which, those who believe, shall be whisked away on some cloud to a safe space with Jesus, while animals, other people and the earth get burnt to a crisp (OK, I’m falling into caricatures here). But if we have, what has been termed an esCAPE-ology (we head off to heaven forever) rather than an Eschatology (where heaven comes to earth and re-news and redeems the earth), we will make different choices about what we build and invest in while we are here.

So what do we need to know about Revelation?

Ok, so here is where I am simply rephrasing the points pulled out by the books I am reading rather than making well-thought-through claims of my own, so feel free to interact and disagree in the comments;

1) Revelation is written in an apocalyptic genre, which was not uncommon at the time of writing. It was a style of writing which demanded interpretation which is why it often seems so hard to interpret to our minds. That being said, given the increase of apocalyptic movies and novels, maybe our age is ripe to re-connect with the significance of being moulded and ordered with a renewed vision of the future.

the goal of revolution is to bring encouragement to believers of all ages that God is working out his purposes even in the midst of tragedy, suffering, and apparently satanic domination. – GK Beale, p.1

2) Revelation is found in the new testament, but draws very strongly on the old testament, scholars estimate that 278 out of the 404 verse contain references and there are over 500 allusion to the old testament (compared to less than 200 in all of Paul’s letters).

John identifies himself as a prophet (Rev1:3) in the line of the OT prophets, speaking the word of the Lord in both judgement and promise. – GK Beale, p.1

3) It seems fairly unlikely that anyone other than the apostle John is the John referred to as the author of revelation. Mostly due to the fact that the author knew the OT so well as to be a Palestinian jew and has enough authority to write a letter taken seriously and authoritative to the churches it was circulated to.

4)  Beale dates the letter at shortly after AD 90 which makes John a very old man. The date of writing revelation is particularly significant for the book of revelation because certain theories of how to read it are based around the idea that it is speaking primarily about the destruction of the temple which is AD70.

5) Apocalyptic literature is actually very close to ideas surrounding the prophetic books of the OT, the main distinction being the images and source as being the throne room of God.

The interest of these prophets was both in forth-telling exhortations to apply to people in the present and in foretelling the future. GK Beale pp.5

There is also emphasis on this heavenly perspective so that the churches will be reminded that real spiritual struggles are going On behind-the-scenes of what appear to be insignificant earthly appearances or offence. Indeed, the reason for addressing churches through their representative angels is to remind them that they have already begun to participate in a heavenly dimension and that their real and eternal home is in the dimension of the new heavens and the inaugurated through Christ’s death and resurrection. Pp.5

The original hearers of revelation claims Beale live in a worldly culture which makes sin appear normal and righteousness appear strange (sounds familiar!)

In particular, John writes because he perceives there is a real danger that the churches will conform too what are considered the”normal” values of the world– system rather than two goals transcendent truth. Pp.6

Why might revelation be important for us today?

More than simply figuring out what might happen in the future, which even Jesus admitted is not fully known to Him, revelation is a letter attempting to narrate complex current events, political and cultural in a way that helps believers resist the temptation to simply follow the trends that surround them and recognise that forces of evil and God’s unfolding victory and very much at play in the midst. Many movies imagine what our lives might be like if the foundations of abundant resources, social order and norms were removed, Christian eschatology affirms that God intends to re-make the perceive foundations of our world that in a way the ultimately reveals beauty and love rather than fear. Maybe revelation can help us grapple with that in ways we never have before.

In the next post I’ll look at the four ways of interpreting revelation…


If you want to receive articles like this once a week to your email sign up here



  1. I’ll be honest and say I wrote the title down at some point as it was recommended, but can’t remember exactly from where, but it was well acclaimed, as is G.K. Beale. 

“Of the Seven Deadly Sins, anger is possibly the most fun. To lick your wounds, to smack your lips over grievances long past, to roll over your tongue the prospect of bitter confrontations still to come, to savor… Read More

Frederick Buechner

Friday (on Saturday again) Link List | 5th December 2015

This weeks link list is simplifying slightly more into the format of my good friend Brandon Jones who runs his own link list, but more true to the sense of list! Enjoy links, with less commentary from yours truly this week!

…If you read something you think should be featured submit it here, starting your message LINK LIST SUGGESTION.


If you want to receive articles like this once a week to your email sign up here


What I posted here recently

Theology & Christianity


Images


Gift Ideas

Miscellany

James Bay – Hold back the river